Recent E-Mail Bulletins
Mars Life:
Did the Viking Lander miss something?
1/10/2007
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16516952/?GT1=8921 Thanks Karl for the source.
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2007/01/07/D8MGNLN02.html Thanks Daniel for this source.
Evo's wanna find liquid water on Mars, 'cuz they think it'll prove Mars life, and they think that'll prove evolution. At the American Astronomical Society, WA StU said the 1976 Mars Viking probe didn't find life ... 'cuz Mars life's not water-based, but water-peroxide based. So there really is Mars life (bacteria) and "evo's true." Can you say "pixie dust."
Schulze-Makuch acknowledges he can't prove that Martian microbes exist, but given the Martian environment and how evolution works, "it makes sense."
One NASA astrobiologist said, the WSU paper piqued his interest ... but also said, "Logical consistency is nice, but it's not enough anymore." I'm open to the possibility," said a scientist at the Marine Biological Lab in Mass., and member of the National Research Council. But he cautioned against "just-so stories about what is possible." Spoken like an real scientist.
"We think there's about 7 million tons of Earth soil sitting on Mars [blown there by the solar wind]. You have to consider the possibility that if we find life on Mars, it could have come from Earth."
evo Kenneth Nealson (Newsweek, 9/21/98, p12) |
Neanderthal DNA
1/9/2007 Evo Svante Paabo's Neanderthal DNA group
(11/16/06 Nature) and another group (11/17
Science) reported that ... we split from
Neanders 370 - 516Ka (thou yrs) ago.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences says
37Ka ago we "got" a brain gene that 70% of us still have
today. They say Neanders or "some other" missing
link first "evolved" this gene, 1000Ka
ago and somehow slipped it to us. (Science News,
11/18/06, p323)
Evo-experts are still
arguing if Neanders were the same species as
us. But they were! They had
music, tools,
art,
religion, and hunting
parties. They could
talk -- they
were people!
And the newest evo-idea?
-- they went extinct
because ... they took women with
them hunting! "It's a
Neanderthal thing -- you wouldn't understand."
|
Hobbit Fossil
1/5/2007 Evo's can't
decide if the 2005 "hobbit" fossil (aka "Flo") ... is
a missing link, deformed, or a pigmy. "It's a bit like our
Pluto," says NYU (Science
News, 11/18/06, p330). The 11/06
Journ of Evol Biology
says "current
pygmy populations develop
primitive-looking
skeletal features much like Flo" (Sci
News, p331). Flo's
discoverer says ... that's
"a complete crock"
(Sci News, p331).
Evo Bernard Wood of GWU says Flo's skull is not
right anyway ... 'cuz the sediments
squished it sideways.
SUNY-StonyBrook says, "Flo resembles
Lucy" and had a
chimp-size
brain. Stone Age tools nearby, were "dated" as 700Kya (thou
yrs ago), even tho evo's think
humans didn't
"evolve" til 50Kya which
makes it even worse!
These articles don't
mention ... that after the first Flo report -- local
natives
all reported "our
ancestors
said there were
little hairy people who lived in those caves
years ago." How could stories be
handed down
12Ka (thou yrs) and
still ... be right?
Maybe it was more recent,
(like since Noah's Flood
4354 yrs ago) and
their
dates are off ... like
all evo-stories! Dr J
|
DNA News
1/3/2007"The finding could
upset
a central view in biology --
that proteins made of the same
amino acids are identical." (Science News,
12/23-30/06, p404)
Every three DNA
nucleotides (called a codon) ... codes for
one of the
20
amino acids -- the building blocks of all proteins.
Way
more than 20 codons are possible. So,
different codons
can code for the
same amino acid.
I wasalways
taught this makes
the DNA code "redundant"
and helps stop nucleotide mutations
from
changing
anything. (Wouldn't that work
against
"evolution" though?)
"Biologists
have
long held that
swapping one codon for another [like in a mutation]
doesn't change the resulting protein's
structure,
as long as both codons
insert the same amino acid." (p404)
Now an online report in
Science (12/21/06) says "an
atypical codon
may ...
change the
speed at which a
protein is made ... end[ing] up with a
different
shape" (Nat Cancer Inst). Oregon Health
& Sci Univ says this "could be
very widespread and
not
appreciated at all right now."
(Sci News,
p405).
This means the coded info in DNA is way
more complex and
way more specific -- than
anybody ever
imagined! This
means -- if
anything changes
DNA (like a
mutation) -- the
chance it might
help
anything (like evolution
says it does!) ... is
really
stupid-level
obvious --
impossible!
So evo is impossible. I love science.
Keep learning. Dr J
|
Big Bang "dark matter" evo-book
1/2/2007"Dark Cosmos: In Search of
Our Universe's Missing Mass and Energy"
HarperCollins, 2006
The book
admits Big
Bang says, "amazingly,
only 5 percent
of the matter in the universe is
observable ... the
rest
is invisible,
perhaps composed
of dark matter
surrounded by dark energy."
What
are these
things? At least they said
"perhaps"! It also
admits,
"scientists infer the existence
of these". They
are 100%
inference ...
no data, no observations, no falsification, no
testability -- all theory -- based on the idea of a universe
without God. It says
"the
difficult notion
of dark energy ...
could explain
the expanding universe." Sad. How about where the Bible says
God "stretcheth
out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a
tent to dwell in"? (Isa 40:22) |
Devolution is True
1/1/2007
Creationist Joseph
Mastropaolo makes the analogy that
believing in evolution, is just like believing in a
perpetual motion machine
... something which can never exist.
Evolution says that mutations and natural selection
will cause life to come closer to
perfection of all species. What we
actually
see and
observe is ...
mutations and natural selection will
always
-- cause life to come closer
to extinction
in all species. Evo-think is strange.
Thanks Dr M, for pointing this out. Readers ... keep
thinking. Dr J |
Evo Hybrid Answer?
12/29/2006 Evo's are getting desperate. Since mutation and
extinction can't make
new species, now they're
saying it's hybridization
that does it. TX St U discovered a new
hybrid butterfly, so they say, "well
this is how new species
start".
In 3/06, genes in humans and chimps "showed" we
hybridized after being separate
"4 mill yrs".
Mich St U (an evo-hotbed)
says, "we'd been
brainwashed
into
thinking
hybrids are
dead ends." (Science
News, 12/2/06, p356) Maybe that'sbecause
... they usually
can't reproduce!??! Maybe.
Like a
mule (horse-donkey
hybrid)! No mating -- that'd put an
end to your evo-story
real quick -- now
wouldn't it ??!
Dr J
|
Chromosome Proof we're Monkeys?
12/28/2006A tough evo-proof is, only
chimps and humans have the same parts of
certain chromosomes, flipped 'round backwards (called
inversions). Evo's
say this comes from back when we were in the
same
gene pool. Now we know more of this story.
The 9/22/06 issue of
Science reports fruitfly
inversions are
"in some individuals and not in others ... follow a pattern
... in
response to
climate."
When global warming started, some northern flies
went ahead and inverted the same genes their
tropical cousins had. (Science
News, 12/2/06, p363)
Hey, if all it takes is being in the
same climate,
to get the same inversions ... and people and
chimps (whose genes are alot the same
anyway)
came from the same climate off the Ark ... then
it would make perfect sense that when genes were
flippin' ... we'd both flip ... the same ways! Then
millennia
later ... evo's end up saying it means --
you're a monkey !
|
How fast can evolution go?
12/27/2006The 10/14/06 issue of
Science quotes U of
Cambridge, "if animals have the
evolutionary potential, this could
rectify some of the problems with
global warming." (Science
News, 12/2/06, p363) Wait.
I heard
global warming only takes like a
century. I
heard evolution
takes
millions of years.
But evo's want us to
believe evolution
can
save us
from warming!?
U
Tex-Austin says, "mountaintop species and corals --
they
haven't evolved. They
just died" ... affected by global
warming. (Sci News, p364) What? -- everybody
else
did
evolve?
in only 50 years
they
evolved? Over Darwin's dead
body!
"As global warming continues,
some will die and some will stay."
(p364) extinction. That's
natural selection. Evo's will try
to tell you
that the
end
of species (extinction) proves evo -- it
doesn'tt. Darwin's
book was "Origin of the Species"
not
"Ending of
the Species". Keep thinking. Dr J |
| |
|
